I know the spikes on the front of these shoes will be an instant “nay” for many of you, but I’m afraid I can’t agree with you on that one, because, oh, how these make my heart flutter! The shape and colour mix combines to create the perfect, understated peep toe, while those spikes give them a bit of bite (literally, probably: I’m fairly sure they’d “bite” my feet every time I tried to put them on), and make them even more covetable.
If you’re not keen on Dixie, however, how about her toothless, but still beautiful, sister Daryl?
As you can see Daryl has the same lovely shape, but without the spikes, and in a softer, nude and grey upper. They’re also a little cheaper, at £445 compared to the £565 you’d pay for the spiked version.
Which do you prefer?
Love the shape, but I think I would go for the second ones. I can appreciate the softer colours and the lack of studs. (who would have ever thought)
I think the second one might be more popular, but I like the first one’s attitude!!!
Love the first one!! With these little spikes and this beautiful shade of nude they become my new favourite ROOOARR Shoes :D!!
Really loooove!!
Momo
I like the first ones better, even though the spikes are a bit too much. Studs in general would have been fine. I’m afraid that the spikes would not only scratch my feet, but also ruin tights and furniture.
The unspiked version, they are just gorgeous.
Ouch! Although they’d be awfully useful for walking alone- “kicking where it counts” would gain a whole new meaning.
The first one is a unique design,the tooth were added to shoes,love this..