A lot of the time, when a pair of shoes winds up on The Outnet, I’m amazed to see it there. Sometimes, though, as in the case of these Phi peep toes, I find myself thinking, “Well, OK, I can see how that one made it to the sale rack…” These aren’t at all mainstream, and I can understand why a lot of people wouldn’t find them appealing, but I find them wonderful to look at: they definitely qualify as “shoe art”, but do they qualify as something you’d want to put on your feet? If you think so, they’re down to £237 (from £790, so quite a saving if they’re your kinda thing!) at The Outnet.
No, they definitely do not qualify as something I’d like to put on my feet. Never.
.-= Tracey´s last blog ..Shoe Retrospective, part 1 =-.
This is what happens when our robotic overlords try their hands at shoe design. Yeuch!
.-= Selina´s last blog ..Today’s nails: Barielle Polished Princess and Slate of Affairs =-.
With a more normal plataform (or none at all) and ditching the circle on the front could have worked for me… but no.
They have a split personality: I can imagine the heel going with a biker boot or the rest going with a more “demure” heal. Fail for me I’m afraid.
I would buy them if I have the money to spare.
.-= Gracia´s last blog ..The Perfect Buckled Boots =-.
No. Just….NO.
They are not shoe art. They are a hodge podge of randomness, in bad proportions.
love to wear high heels in each and in every style..!! it makes style very trendy..!!