I must admit, I wouldn’t recognise Alexandra Richards if she fell on me (she’s the daughter of Keith Richards, if you were similarly in the dark), but I DID recognise the shoes she wore to the Tribeca Film Festival Dinner last night – although given that the evening was hosted by Chanel, it’s perhaps not a huge surprise that so many of the guests were dressed in the brand!
These are the flower-front wooden platforms from the S/S 2010 collection, and I’m guessing they were borrowed for the occasion, as are so many of the shoes we see on the red carpet, which would account for the gape at the back of the heel. It must be so frustrating to get to wear fabulous shoes for free, only to find that they’re ALWAYS the wrong size, but ah well, first world problems…
What does everyone think of these? Take a look under the jump to see what Alexandra wore with them.
I would love them, just without the flowers. The retro seventies vibe of the heel itself is gorgeous though!
.-= Lauren´s last blog ..Ruby Shoesdays (& Shoes #8) =-.
I think she chose the right outfit to go with them, nice and simple. Don’t really like them myself, though.
.-= Alex´s last blog ..Fashionably Late to the Shoeper Shoe Challenge =-.
Not only do I not like the shoes, but the rest of her ensemble, including hair and makeup, is DAZZLINGLY BORING.
Since most designer dresses are loaned to actresses for the one event, I’d think the same applies to shoes. So…no loss if it doesn’t fit I think.
Yes, that’s what I said in the post.
I agree with Rebecca’s comment. The shoes and outfit don’t seem to coincide at all. The dress is boring, the hair is boring and the shoes are not.
I think the whole look is blah and dull.
The best thing about her look is the shoes. The rest… meh.
.-= Tracey´s last blog ..Home sweet home =-.