These are the kind of shoes that could do some serious damage. To me, I mean. Because I’m such a klutz there’s just no telling what kind of trouble I could get into with these attached to my feet:
Let’s just hope they’re not as sharp as they look, hmm?
Danger aside, I think this is possibly the first time I’ve featured a pair of shoes with a cone embellishment. We’ve had bows, flowers, buttons… even faces and rodents and other strange items. But never cones, so kudos to Giuseppe Zanotti for being the first to break the “cones on shoes” drought.
What do you think of the shoes, though? Other than the fact that they’re wallet-breakingly expensive, obviously? (They’re £454: click here to buy them.)
I see people wearing these and I’m like, “You should take those back to the store! You left half of your shoes behind!” And the fact that they’re called “gladiator sandals” makes my inner historian attempt butterknife suicide.
Without the cones, beautiful. With them, no. Not for me, at least. I don;t want bruised legs all the time – or at least, when wearing them!
I’m a klutz too, I tend to trip over myself, but I still would totally wear these. I have a pair of shoes with cones on them:)) With actual ICE CREAM CONES:) from Miss L Fire via Asos:
http://msveve.blogspot.com/2011/04/shoe-challenge-66-icecream.html
I love interseting shoes.)
BTW is it just me or does it look like they’re missing one cone at the bottom strap??
I’d injure myself wearing them)) Aside from that, I want them!
whoa…killer shoes. The heel is SUPER thin…I think I will be more worried about snapping the heel into two than poking anyone by accident with the cones
They look dangerous, all right 🙂
There’s not a lot of shoes for that kind of money. I’ll pass. I don’t know what’s up with those cones either. I mean, I have never woken up and thought, I can’t get through another day without some shoes with cones on them. Ever.
But one must admit, one’s dance partner will think twice about stepping on one’s feet!