We’ve discussed denim shoes before here at Shoeperwoman, and the consensus generally seems to be that, with a few notable exceptions, denim and shoes should not mix.
We’ve also discussed gemstones on shoes, and come to more or less the same conclusion: that if there’s too many of them, they can look just a little bit cheap.
I pretty much agree with both of those conclusions, and yet… and yet I have a feeling that if I were to see these Brian Atwood slingbacks in person, I’d probably love them. Maybe even a lot. I’m not saying I’d buy them, obviously: in fact, given that they’re £965 I can say with some confidence that I definitely WOULDN’T buy them, no matter HOW much I loved them (I value my marriage too much), but I’d maybe want to.
Would you? If so, you can get them at Colette.
I’m going to give those a solid yikes xD They remind me of when I was little and I had this bandanna that looked just like that, with the denim and the same sort of stones. I didn’t even really think it was stylin’ then.
I feel like I should be embarrassed to admit it, but I kind of love them. I have no idea what I’d wear them with though, and certainly can’t afford them, but if I won the lottery I’d buy them, and FIND something to wear them with.
i’m not a huge fan but i love the shape of the shoe itself
Someone needs to take away his Bedazzler. That’s too much.
Oh no, I wouldn’t buy these. And I’m emailing a picture to Shoeperman right now and telling him to watch out!
.-= Tracey´s last blog ..Bad =-.
Nooooo. These are just all wrong.
I’m torn. I like them, but on the other hand they remind me of when I was elementary school circa 1991 and everyone was wearing Bedazzled denim skirts/vests.
How…delightfully countrysuperstarchic.
.-= caz´s last blog ..EOTD =-.
They’re bedazzled denim.
…so why do I love them?
.-= Leigh´s last blog ..wet n wild Mega Protein Mascara in Black 641 =-.
not a big fan…would have loved it if it had the bedazzle only on the heel