Fashion Police
Dollface
Forever Amber

Olivia Fox in ballet flats on the Grammy Awards red carpet

Posted by
|

LFI GRAMMYARR231 Olivia Fox in ballet flats on the Grammy Awards red carpet

You could be forgiven, sometimes, for thinking that the dress code for most red carpet events reads “must wear very high heels”, so it makes a nice change to see someone flouting that convention, and turning up in a pair of flats. Olivia Fox chose these metallic flats to wear with her pale green dress at last night’s Grammy Awards. She looks very fresh and pretty here, although in contrast to some of the other outfits on show last night, she actually managed to look rather casual in comparison.

What do you think of this as a red carpet look?




Comments

  1. Shoes not blues

    February 1, 2010

    Lovely shoes, perfectly appropriate for an evening do. No fan of the dress though, I must admit. And the bag looks dodgy too.

  2. Denise

    February 1, 2010

    I think it was an excellent choice!
    .-= Denise´s last blog ..Mine mine mine! =-.

  3. Tracey

    February 1, 2010

    It seems a bit casual but compared to Lady GaGa she looks very pretty and fresh.
    .-= Tracey´s last blog ..Beginnings =-.

  4. Sonia

    February 1, 2010

    is that really olivia wilde?

  5. Biana

    February 2, 2010

    For me it looks way too casual, more a picnic thing. And it`s me or the shoes look chipped?

  6. Alison

    February 2, 2010

    She looks nice, but not for the Grammys. I think you should go a bit wild for the Grammys. I agree she looks like she is going to a picnic instead.

  7. Ellen S.

    February 2, 2010

    Seems too casual to me. Looks like she’s headed to brunch.

  8. Lauren

    February 2, 2010

    She’s dressed waaay too casual for the Grammys. She could have gotten away with the flats with maybe a fancier dress and better hairstyle – maybe with her hair down.

  9. Helene

    February 2, 2010

    it’s not Olivia Wilde, it’s Olivia Fox

    • Shoeperwoman

      February 2, 2010

      Whoops, so it is – corrected now!

Add a comment